Skip to main content

Table 2 Effect of mother’s work status on child’s time spent in school

From: Female labor force participation and child education in India: evidence from the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme

Variable

Time spent in school

OLS-FE

2SLS-FE

(1)

(2)

Mother is working

0.293***

6.506***

 

(0.101)

(1.102)

Annual household income in thousands (Rs.)

0.001

0.013

 

(0.001)

(0.013)

Age 5 in 2007 × time

8.768***

14.127***

 

(0.695)

(1.275)

Age 6 in 2007 × time

8.674***

13.948***

 

(0.702)

(1.280)

Age 7 in 2007 × time

8.114***

13.310***

 

(0.699)

(1.264)

Age 8 in 2007 × time

8.030***

13.542***

 

(0.719)

(1.336)

Age 9 in 2007 × time

7.700***

12.987***

 

(0.708)

(1.265)

Age 10 in 2007 × time

7.743***

13.218***

 

(0.696)

(1.297)

Age 11 in 2007 × time

7.233***

12.542***

 

(0.714)

(1.301)

Age 12 in 2007 × time

7.220***

12.827***

 

(0.683)

(1.303)

Age 13 in 2007 × time

6.363***

11.784***

 

(0.762)

(1.344)

Age 14 in 2007 × time

6.458***

12.054***

 

(0.728)

(1.347)

Female child × time

−0.207**

−0.306**

 

(0.088)

(0.135)

Household size

−0.023

−0.050

 

(0.042)

(0.083)

Number of males in the age group 16–60

0.006

0.114

 

(0.097)

(0.127)

Average age of household members

0.017

0.029

 

(0.012)

(0.019)

Land owned (acres) by household in 2007 × time

0.015

0.043*

 

(0.013)

(0.022)

Household’s asset (index) in 2007 × time

0.060**

0.149**

 

(0.028)

(0.065)

Mandal level total night lights in 2006 × time

0.0001

−0.0005*

 

(0.0002)

(0.0002)

NREGS phase 1 district × time

−0.936***

0.803**

 

(0.126)

(0.336)

Baseline enrolment rate in the district × time

−7.822***

−14.074***

 

(0.766)

(1.532)

Child fixed effects

Yes

Yes

Observations

6550

6550

Number of children

3275

3275

R-squared

0.256

 

Weak identification stat (Kleibergen-Paap rk Wald F)

 

7.750

Stock-Yogo weak identification test critical values

 

6.40 (20 %)

Over-identification stat (Hansen J)

 

1.701

Over-identification p value

 

0.192

  1. Notes: Robust standard errors clustered at the child level in parentheses. Significant at *10, **5, and ***1 %