Skip to main content

Table 3 Number of relatives and choice of self-employment, 2SLS Regressions

From: Social-family network and self-employment: evidence from temporary rural–urban migrants in China

 

(1)

(2)

Sample C

Sample D

 

First stage

Endogenous independent variable: Number of relatives

Instrumental variable: Log distance when first migrated

Log distance when first migrated

-.1830**

(.0827)

-.2065***

(.0705)

Male

.4974

(.6815)

.4236

(.7024)

Age

-.0395

(.0518)

-.0264

(.0473)

Years of schooling

.4508***

(.1206)

.4465***

(.1188)

Married

2.4777*

(1.3349)

2.5544*

(1.3520)

Number of children

.3035

(.5082)

.1065

(.5166)

Years since first migrated out of rural area

-.0001

(.0833)

.0070

(.0770)

Constant

Yes

Yes

Home province fixed effects

Yes

Yes

First-stage F statistic

4.89

8.57

 

Second stage

Dependent variable: = 1 if self-employed; = 0 otherwise

Number of relatives

.0384*

(.0230)

.0316**

(.0150)

Male

-.0230

(.0362)

-.0167

(.0313)

Age

-.0049

(.0032)

-.0056**

(.0026)

Years of schooling

-.0262**

(.0104)

-.0224***

(.0075)

Married

.0584

(.0554)

.0723*

(.0432)

Number of children

.0234

(.0262)

.0288

(.0199)

Years since first migrated out of rural area

.0091***

(.0034)

.0079***

(.0027)

Constant

Yes

Yes

Home province fixed effects

Yes

Yes

No. of observations

2,379

2,336

OLS coefficient of “number of relatives”

.00058

(.00060)

.00058

(.00062)

  1. For regression samples, see notes below Table 2.
  2. Standard errors in parentheses are robust to heteroskedasticity and clustered at the city level.
  3. ***statistically significant at the 1 percent level; **statistically significant at the 5 percent level; *statistically significant at the 10 percent level.