Table 9 Heterogeneous impact of Yigong-daizhen project on migrant (on number of project, labor and capital intensity)
From: Do public work schemes deter or encourage outmigration? Empirical evidence from China
| Â | Dependent variable: number of migrant labor (person) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
OLS (1) | OLS (2) | OLS (3) | OLS (4) | |
| Â | Panel A: One VS. More projects | |||
After *Yigong-daizhen *More than one | 50.33*** | 50.29*** | 49.14*** | 51.04*** |
| Â | (17.62) | (17.44) | (16.86) | (17.16) |
| Â | Panel B: Labor use: Above average VS. Below average | |||
After *Yigong-daizhen *Labor intensive | 50.22** | 48.77** | 44.44** | 50.10** |
| Â | (21.80) | (21.64) | (21.02) | (21.27) |
| Â | Panel C: Capital use: Above average VS. Below average | |||
After *Yigong-daizhen *Capital intensive | 1.78 | 4.21 | 10.73 | 8.72 |
| Â | (32.25) | (32.39) | (28.89) | (30.68) |
Control for: | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Two main effects for Diff-in-Diff | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Village level controls | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Types of project | No | No | Yes | Yes |
Province FE | No | No | No | Yes |
N | 4858 | 4858 | 4858 | 4858 |