Skip to main content

Table 3 Effects of temporal distance between pay and reference week on labor force participation

From: Do benefit recipients change their labor supply after receiving the cash transfer? Evidence from the Peruvian Juntos program

 

All individuals

Recipients

Recipients’ partners

Transfer occurred:

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

One week before the reference week

-0.028*

-0.009

-0.009

-0.072**

-0.044

-0.044

0.015*

0.006

0.148

 

(0.016)

(0.030)

(0.030)

(0.029)

(0.060)

(0.060)

(0.009)

(0.007)

(0.203)

During the reference week

-0.027

-0.011

-0.011

-0.054*

-0.046

-0.046

0.002

0.019

0.162

 

(0.017)

(0.032)

(0.032)

(0.029)

(0.059)

(0.059)

(0.012)

(0.016)

(0.206)

At least one week after the reference week

-0.011

-0.007

-0.007

-0.029

-0.024

-0.024

0.010

-0.001

-0.319

 

(0.014)

(0.024)

(0.024)

(0.024)

(0.047)

(0.047)

(0.010)

(0.009)

(0.336)

Municipality fixed effects

No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Additional controls

No

No

Yes

No

No

Yes

No

No

Yes

Observations

1,615

1,615

1,615

859

859

859

756

756

756

R-squared

0.003

0.144

0.144

0.008

0.284

0.284

0.005

0.280

0.280

  1. Notes: Robust standard errors in parentheses. Additional controls include: an indicator for sex, an indicator for marital status (married or living together), age, indicators for educational level (primary, secondary, tertiary), an indicator for Spanish mother tongue, an indicator for poverty status, an indicator for living in rural areas, and interactions terms between an indicator for household head and temporal distance between pay and reference week.
  2. ***p < 0.01, **p < 0.05, *p < 0.1.